2025-06-10 Work order - work record
Participants
See MYM app
Meeting Logistics
In person (Conny joined remotely)
See time and GoToMeeting details on the AgGateway Calendar.
Agenda and Minutes
Main Topics
Use decide tag for any decisions taken
Review background on previous related topics
Topic Leader: @Ben Craker @Conny Graumans
The desired outcome is that the group is aware of previous and other related projects
Pre-meeting notes and references:
Minutes:
Provided quick background on Closed Loop Spray
Discussed European reporting - ADAPT Standard gap check WG
Brief overview of ADAPT Standard scenarios
Discussion on EU regulations coming in to force and some of the different ways they are being implemented in different countries
eCrop ~10 years old
EDI-Crop in NL based on Wageningen
UNCEFACT in France
Discussion on topics and areas to focus efforts
Topic Leader: @Ben Craker @Conny Graumans
The desired outcome is that the group discusses the proposed and on-hold WG’s
Pre-meeting notes and references:
Minutes:
Farmers need to provide digital records of what was applied where
Buffer zones important to pass from FMIS to machine
Machine may need to live update buffer zone based on field conditions
Too many data models, need mapping table
ISO 11783 does not quite cover everything needed for regulatory reporting
GTIN useful but need to include each country's specific crop protection identifier based on product approvals
Shipped Item Instance has support for lot/batch
Sustainability reporting should also be considered
processes to model:
Work Order → Ok To Spray → Work Record
Track/trace crop protection product from manufacturer to application
Adoption, engagement, needed participants
Topic Leader: @Ben Craker @Conny Graumans
The desired outcome is that the group identifies who else needs to be involved to ensure the necessary perspectives are represented
Pre-meeting notes and references:
Minutes:
European FMIS companies need to be engaged
Input providers/coops also important
Understand relation to ISO TC 347 (AHG 8 specifically), do not want to duplicate efforts, keep in mind this work could be passed along to the new TC as well
AHG 8 Field passport/land use history would be a collection of related documents. So similar data requirements but packaged a little differently from what was discussed here