Welcome the group and introductions

AgGateway Antitrust Guidelines

Background

Current Data Privacy and Use White Paper

Group briefly revisits background on former Data Privacy & Security Committee

Group briefly "tours" current white paper (depends on attendees - if same attendees as MYM, can skip)

The group quickly skimmed the existing white paper content.

Identify:

• Noted terms, data elements, questions, sections, or references that are outdated
• Necessary additions
• Skipped items to reconsider

From 7/9 MYM Meet-Up and a follow-up discussion:

• Revisit and update data types
• Look at financial/risk management data at a geospatial level
• Consider IoT (sensors, etc.)
• Consider AI
• Update all references and links
• Add new examples
• Reconsider the concept of "ownership" versus origination
• Revisit/expand key data use areas and questions for agricultural businesses in light of:
  • PIPEDA (Canada)
  • GDPR (EU) and the EU agricultural Code of Conduct
  • Australian agriculture-related Code of Conduct
  • Forthcoming LGPD (Brazil, slated for 2021 implementation), and
  • US state laws, including the CCPA and CPRA (California) and privacy laws and requirements in Virginia, New York, and elsewhere
• Update PII definition to show differences in PII in the US for agriculture, especially in governmental programs, versus PII under GDPR, et al.
• Look into FAIR principles

The group reviewed the ideas discussed on July 9 and in a follow-up conversation with Simone van de Burg of Wangenian

Discussion:

"Ownership" versus "origination"

"How do I do this at home" - in other words, once I have the questions to ask, how do I do it?

First update: focus on AgGateway member companies and keep it 'inside' company-focus

Reviewed items previously considered but not done:

• Targeted executive summaries & talking points
  • Members by industry segment
  • Service providers
  • Farmers
• Supplemental papers
  • De-identification when using & interpreting data
  • Ag data vs Personally Identifiable Information (PII): Different? Same? When and how?
  • Tackle ‘ownership’ as a concept and give resources for individual companies to consider?

Further Discussion:

Farmer versus service provider/advisor (agronomist, etc.) concerns

• Service provider likely used multiple tools from multiple vendors to create maps and prescriptions for the farmer, thus sharing the farmer's data, and the farmer may/may not know
• Also: where does the data go once someone is 'done' with it? How does your data get removed?

Data ethics by design (need to do EARLY in the process of building a system or service)

Summarize update list

Summarize additions list

This activity will take place during the initial white paper maintenance working group meetings.

Group revisits how maintenance work happens

Group determines whether hold an additional Meet-Up or move to Task Force formation

• Will operate as a working group, will be a subgroup of S&G
• Still discussing the level of transparency for this activity; may have an activity tracker, but not a full dashboard
• Will include the ability to track future work actions
• Will have a core group of participants for doing the work, with participants identified through a call for participation.

Jessica Trites Rolle and Brent Kemp to meet and develop call for participation message and draft a simple group charter for the initial maintenance update scope of work. Distribute the call for participation to AgGateway members in the first half of August.

To be scheduled after the call for participation.

23 Jul 2020 at _____ 3 p.m. US Central Time